Showing posts with label Paperwork. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paperwork. Show all posts
Friday, August 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Wait a minute, how old is Ghengis Khan?
So you made it to your senior year and assume you are a big smarty pants in History. I'll give you credit, you know some cool stuff (Pancho, Lincoln, Franz Ferdinand, etc.), but don't get too big for your britches. Prepare to upgrade your "smarty pant" size because there is so much more to learn - prepare for an IB history-fest between now and May. Bring on Mao, Stalin, Mussolini and the Cold War.
Super-cool historical person of the month
Wait a minute, how old is Ghengis Khan?
12th grade HL student Blogs
Blog Archive
These are Udesen approved access points for great research
Great IB Access for Stalin, Mao and Cold War
Links to info on Wars
Soviet Union Links
Cool Latin America Links
Udesen's other blogs
Organizing Udesen's Blog
- Assignment (3)
- Expectations (1)
- Paperwork (1)
Ib Rubric for Blog (on most entries)
Here is a brief breakdown of how you will be graded on blog entries:
7: Excellence beyond reproach (you should be published)
6: Very good performance: Detailed knowledge and understanding, logically structured, appropriate terminology; analysis, evaluation and synthesis of knowledge; strong awareness of multiple perspectives; strong evidence and critical thinking
5: Good Performance: Sound knowledge and understanding; answers are logical and coherent, but could be extended; some integration of knowledge and concepts; tendency to be more descriptive than evaluative although shows contrasting views; solid evidence of critical thinking; an ability to analyze data
4: Strong Performance: Secure knowledge and understanding beyond 'common sense' points; ability to structure, but need to improve clarity and focus; ability to develop ideas, relate facts, substantiate assertions, but is more descriptive than analytical; ability to interpret data, solve problems and engage in analysis.
3: Mediocre performance: Demonstrates some knowledge and understanding; a basic use of terminology and structure; some ability to make links between facts and ideas. Assignment clearly lacks the depth of response.
2: Poor performance: limited knowledge and understanding, some sense of structure, limited use of terminology, limited ability to make links between facts and ideas. Information is very limited in depth expected for assignment.
1: Very poor performance: very limited knowledge and understanding; no clear structure, inadequate terminology, limited demonstration of understanding of data or analysis. Large gaps in demonstration or completion of expectations.
7: Excellence beyond reproach (you should be published)
6: Very good performance: Detailed knowledge and understanding, logically structured, appropriate terminology; analysis, evaluation and synthesis of knowledge; strong awareness of multiple perspectives; strong evidence and critical thinking
5: Good Performance: Sound knowledge and understanding; answers are logical and coherent, but could be extended; some integration of knowledge and concepts; tendency to be more descriptive than evaluative although shows contrasting views; solid evidence of critical thinking; an ability to analyze data
4: Strong Performance: Secure knowledge and understanding beyond 'common sense' points; ability to structure, but need to improve clarity and focus; ability to develop ideas, relate facts, substantiate assertions, but is more descriptive than analytical; ability to interpret data, solve problems and engage in analysis.
3: Mediocre performance: Demonstrates some knowledge and understanding; a basic use of terminology and structure; some ability to make links between facts and ideas. Assignment clearly lacks the depth of response.
2: Poor performance: limited knowledge and understanding, some sense of structure, limited use of terminology, limited ability to make links between facts and ideas. Information is very limited in depth expected for assignment.
1: Very poor performance: very limited knowledge and understanding; no clear structure, inadequate terminology, limited demonstration of understanding of data or analysis. Large gaps in demonstration or completion of expectations.